The playful friendship between the actors has allowed Hamill to be his true comedic self wherever Ford is concerned, and this addition to the Han vs. The actor has offered countless entertaining anecdotes to fans of the franchise, especially when it comes to Harrison Ford's Han Solo. Hamill has never been shy about adding his two cents to Star Wars debates and theories such as this, which only makes the addition even richer.
#Bernie sanders sherriff of nottingham full#
See Hamill's tweet and the full edit below: The actor tops it off by writing, " Turns out Bernie shot first," fully connecting it to the famous Star Wars debate.
Mark Hamill has taken to Twitter to share a fan-made edit of Senator Bernie Sanders seated at the same table with Han and Greedo, bringing back a popular meme from 2021. Now, Luke Skywalker himself has added to the debate with his own hilarious addition. Related: Lucas’ Early Star Wars Sequels Plan Proves Your Chosen One Theories Wrong Audiences have gone back and forth for decades now in an attempt to decide once and for all which one of them fired the first shot. With the grime of a blaster bolt left on the wall behind Han, it has never been fully clear which character pulled their trigger finger first, even if Han was the only one who made it out alive.
Ever since 1977's Star Wars: Episode IV - A New Hope first released, viewers have been asking whether the smuggler or his foe shot first in the quick blaster draw that ended up killing Greedo. Some listeners will regard this theory as oversimplified, inaccurate, and misleading.However, no debate amongst Star Wars fans has been as long-lived and intense as the showdown between Han Solo and Greedo in the Mos Eisley Cantina. Most small fry haven’t yet recovered from the ’08 crisis, but the “too big to fail” gang is doing better than ever. When the market is up, the little guy profits a bit while the big operators rake it in when it’s down, little folks lose big, while fat cats are largely cushioned against major losses. They might consider using the stock market as an “unfairness index”. To them policies that erect obstacles to their intended progress – or threaten to - are by nature bad.īut Americans have little tolerance for economic unfairness – for policies of betrayal, rigging the game or stacking the deck – and Democrats have been missing this point. Americans assess economic policy by where they intend to be, not by where they are at any given moment.
#Bernie sanders sherriff of nottingham free#
Capitalism begets winners and losers that’s the way the free market works. That the benefits are short-term seems not to matter to those Americans who tend to think only in the short-term.Īnd as Jacob Weisberg of Slate has observed, this is a win-win for Republicans: they can deliver short-term benefits to lower earners, who’ll vote for them in the midterms, and ignore the long-term budget-busting aspects of their work, leaving it to Democrats to clean up later - which will require unpopular measures like raising taxes - making it easy for the GOP again to campaign as the party of fiscal restraint and responsibility.Īnd let’s be clear: most Americans are comfortable with income inequality. A bit of extra cash feels good – no wonder it’s popular. After all, the economy seems in good shape, unemployment is down, and the immediate future looks like clear sailing. Tax cuts seem appropriate to many who are disinclined to read the fine print. And while it may seem odd that Congress would pass legislation privileging the wealthy donors and big corporations of the 1%, it’s not hard to understand why. The so-called tax reform law reminds me of a nightmarish revision of Robin Hood, with the Sheriff of Nottingham skillfully manipulating the good citizens of Sherwood into believing his rapacious policies will actually benefit them.
0 kommentar(er)
